Thursday, December 17, 2015

Kansas Education Commissioner Watson touts new ESEA (A Blog from KASB)


Kansas Education Commissioner Randy Watson on Thursday touted the new federal education law that will replace many of the requirements of No Child Left Behind.
“Overall, we are very excited,” Watson told the board of the Coalition of Innovative School Districts.
“We see a lot of flexibility in the law. Every day we get into it deeper, we get more excited about possibilities in the law,” he said.
The state education agency is putting together two panels to dive into the newest version of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which was recently adopted on a bi-partisan basis in Congress and signed into law by President Barack Obama.
The new law keeps intact the annual testing schedule under No Child Left Behind, but generally leaves to the states how much importance to place on the test scores.
Watson said the new law removes much of the authority over education from the U.S. Secretary of Education and gives it back to the states.
He also said he sees opportunities under the new state law to boost early childhood education.
“The board (Kansas State Board of Education) is extremely interested in kindergarten readiness. We are going to expand our presence in early childhood. We see over the long-term that could be beneficial,” he said.
He said ESEA won’t be the major driving force of Kansas education but will be more like the “backbone,” he said.

I'm from Kansas by Dr. John Heim, KS Association of School Boards Executive Director

Pickups and Schools

This year has brought some big changes for me. Among them, I am not commuting 120 miles a day anymore. I also traded my 10-year-old Nissan pickup on a new Ford F150. These changes made me think about an interesting argument made by a Kansas policy group about median spending in schools. The argument is the Legislature should take the median spending level for schools and limit spending to that median for each spending category. The assumption, I guess, is that any spending above the median for each category is wasteful.

So let’s take a look at two hypothetical situations, call them medians for 2014JH and 2016JH. (Since I only had two data sets, I used average instead of median for a measure of central tendency.)

Spending Category               2014JH Monthly       2016JH Monthly       Average
Vehicle Maintenance                       $200                        $20                     $110
Gas                                                   $360                        $20                     $190
Principal and Interest                        $0                           $400                   $200

Based upon this comparison and the policy group’s reasoning, 2014JH is overspending on monthly maintenance by $90 and gas by $170, whereas 2016JH is grossly overspending on principal and interest by $200! These two JH’s are obviously on vehicular spending sprees. The differences in travel and age of vehicle explain the differences.

So let’s look at two large districts in a metropolitan area. One district, call them Metro City, is at the city core. Their buildings were primarily built in the 1950s and ‘60s. The bond debt has been paid off for years, but these buildings require as much or more maintenance as a 2006 Nissan pickup. Their maintenance and energy costs will be relatively high, certainly higher than the median.

Red River, the second district is in the same metropolitan area and has been growing rapidly. All of their buildings have been built since the 1980s. Because of the rapid growth, they add a new school building every year or so. This district’s bond and interest costs will be far above the Metro City’s and above the median in their category. But because they built with modern designs and materials, their energy costs are far less than the median. Maintenance costs on their newer facilities will be less than Metro City and the median.

If one is looking for a way to take cheap shots at different district’s spending levels in different categories, they would say Metro City is wasteful and inefficient because of high energy and maintenance costs out of one side of their mouth and Red River is wasteful and inefficient because of high bond and interest costs out of the other, while ignoring the obvious big picture differences.

Kansas School districts are as different as the children they serve. Garden City and Maize have similar enrollments, but are unique in more ways than my short blog can list. Should we really expect them to be at the same median spending levels in total in categories? If you believe that, you haven’t driven a Ford lately.

Thursday, December 10, 2015

President signs into law reauthorization of ESEA






















President Barack
Obama on Thursday signed into law the bi-partisan overhaul of No Child Left
Behind.



The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act shifts some
authority over public schools from the federal government to the states and
local districts.



The new law, which is called the Every Student Succeeds Act, maintains mandated
testing of students in third- through eighth-grades and once in high school,
but it allows states to determine how to use those test scores to evaluate
teachers and schools.



Here is a link to a White House analysis of the new law.

Monday, December 7, 2015

More than 500 education officials participate in KASB's Annual Conference

USD 331  Board Members & Superintendent among those in Attendance
A Blog by KS Association of School Boards
More than 500 school
leaders met in Wichita last week to participate in the 98th Annual KASB
Conference.
School board members
and administrators attended breakout sessions, visited schools, heard inspiring
speeches, toured exhibits and elected office holders during the meeting at the
Hyatt Regency and Century II Convention Center.
KASB President Don
Shimkus, a member of the Oxford USD 358 school board, urged education advocates
to tell their neighbors and colleagues about the great work being conducted on
behalf of students at their local schools.
“Rally your community
around your school,” Shimkus said.
KASB Executive
Director John Heim said Kansas public schools have one of the best stories in
the nation to tell.
Kansas ranks eighth
among states in student outcomes while ranking 27th in spending per pupil.
Every state that ranks ahead of Kansas spends more per pupil.
“We have better
results for less money than any other state,” Heim said.
Both Heim and Shimkus
urged KASB delegates to try to lead the conversation on public schools in
Kansas.
The Delegate Assembly
voted unanimously for Dayna Miller, a member of the Basehor-Linwood USD 458
school board, as president-elect designee.
“I promise to do my
best and continue our mission and advocate for all students,” Miller said. Her
term as president will start in July 2017.
Shimkus’ term will
run to July 2016 at which time Amy Martin, a member of the Olathe USD 233
school board, will become president.
The Delegate Assembly
also approved its 2016 Legislative Committee report, which outlines KASB’s
goals and stances for the upcoming Legislative Session.








































Here is a link to that report.